![]() Shaving $10 off the Gaming K4 makes this sample more appealing, while providing a slightly larger feature set and still delivering similar fundamental designs. Heavily in favor for the Killer though, is price. It only proves that testing methodologies, software version releases, and the current phase of the moon can impact results both in favor and against any particular sample. But lagging behind the average by nearly 2% does not completely invalidate a product’s existence. I assumed people wanted to keep it in line with the Killer SLI etc as they are the same board but perhaps there was some issue. I was downvoted when I stated in another topic that the board was rumored to not be able to hit 3200 or higher due to a PCB limitation on that particular board. For the Killer SLI/ac, performance has been back and forth. Asrock Gaming K4 X370 is now EOL as stated by Asrock. The ASRock X370 Gaming K4 sets the bar for all metrics here, representing a near perfect average representation for value, performance, and price at the time of publication. Fully populated DDR4-2933 is where we settled, and we can now sleep soundly at night knowing that memory seems to be fixed on at least this AMD platform. Switching back over to Trident-Z, fully populated DDR4-3200 only produced errors during moderate to heavy usage. ![]() The Predator configuration did not run above 2666 MHz with DIMM slots fully populated, but this is a drastic improvement from where we were at launch day. Instantly, half populated HyperX Predator DIMMs ran similarly to the G.Skill kits with stability achievable at DDR4-2933. Determined to succeed, updating to P2.5 was the cat’s pajamas.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |